Joanna Yeates: Was Tabak Hooked On Richard Desmond’s Bitch In The Boot Films And James Murdoch’s Porn?
JOANNA Yeates Murder: So. Vincent Tabak did murder Joanna Yeates. The women the paper dubbed “Jo” and the Daily Mirror renamed “Joanne” was murdered in her Bristol flat by a Dutch engineer.
And now finally after days and days of waiting the tabloids can lead with sensationalist articles about what a complete nutter Tabak is. Not a “strange” one like Chris Jefferies, the innocent man the tabloids libelled in their haste to own the story. But an actual murdering nuter.
Before those headlines, the facts:
Police found Police seized Tabak’s computers. On them they found evidence that he had viewed porn in which women were held by the neck during sex. He also viewed images of women bound in the boot of cars. (He kept and moved Joanna Yeates’ dead body in the boot of his own car.)
Prosecutors believed that the pornographic films showed why Tabak held Miss Yeates by the neck – which led to her death.
In autumn 2010, Tabak checked into a LA hotel under the name Francis Tabak. There is evidence to suggest he then hired an escort. But there is no proof that he did, nor that he had sex with one. The police are planning to question him further.
Now for those headlines:
“HOOKED ON SICK PORN AND STRANGLING” – Daily Mirror
Hooked? As in addicted?
“TABAK’S CHOKE PORN STASH” – The Sun
“JO KILLER HOOKED ON PORN AND TARTS” – Daily Star
Again, the man is addicted?
You might care to know that the Daily Star’s sister organ is Channel X, the Fantasy Channel, on which you can watch porn films based on S&M and shows called Britain’s Most Extreme – “Striving to find the filthiest members of society“; Tenacious Teens, Mother & Daughters – for those of you addicted to incest-themed sex; and…Bitch In The Boot.
And if hiring prostitutes is a hint to harbouring murderous thoughts, Andrew Neil once dated a sometime call girl named Pamela Bordes. Neil edited Murdoch’s Sunday Times. He’s now on the BBC. He’s never killed anyone.
Vincent Tabak is a calculating murderer. The news on his porn and escorts was not made known to the jurors because the judge thought it not relevant to the murder trial. The judge thought it was unfair to make the news known to them. The judge thought it would be prejudicial. And if it was prejudicial to a guilty verdict, Tabak could appeal. The prosecution had to stick to the relevant facts. All this news of porn and escorts tells is that Tabak liked looking at images of sex. Many men do. Porn is a hugely profitable business.
The news of what Tabak watched tells us very little now. But it does make for salacious headlines…
Posted: 29th, October 2011 | In: Key Posts, Reviews Comment (1) | TrackBack | Permalink
