Jacqui Smith In Home Porn Scandal
JACQUI Smith, the pot-smoking Home Secretary, has been caught in an expenses row – using taxpayers’ money to pay for porn films.
Can the matter be explained as research into the sex industry she wishes to stamp on? Did any of the films feature East European slaves? And should we the taxpayers get to see the evidence and decide for ourselves?
Julie Bindel: Do you know anyone personally who has used a prostitute?
JS: [Hesitates] No.
Not paying for sex… How about “downloading” prostitutes? Is that a thought crime, a gateway drug to shagging prostitutes or rape, Jacqui?
JB: Some commentators have suggested that this new law won’t lead to many prosecutions – do you think that this is correct?
JS: It is likely we will get more prosecutions than when we were solely reliant on rape as an offence [in cases where men bought sex with trafficked women]. Of course, I understand that this is the start of the process. But we need to send out a message to men to think twice.
And rape? Is downloading porn a gateway drug to rape?
MEN who knowingly pay for sex with a trafficked girl will be charged with RAPE under tough new laws. Home Secretary Jacqui Smith wants to end the evil trade of smuggling women into Britain to become sex slaves. She claimed seven out of ten hookers are run by pimps or had been trafficked into Britain by organised crime gangs.
Now read on…
Sunday Express: “JACQUI SMITH PUT ADULT FILMS ON EXPENSES”
Sunday Express, owned by Richard Desmond, the man who once gave us Asian Babes and now presides over Channel X, exposes porn story shocker?!
The Express that brought us:
“SWEARING NOW THE BLIGHT OF BRITAIN – How TV is degrading our public life.”
Desmond who brought his newspaper from:
“…old Etonian, anti-Semitic, fucking wankers”
And what Channel did the Home Sexretary watch?
Daily Mail: “Blue movies on expenses: How Jacqui Smith’s husband watched pornographic movies… paid for by the taxpayer”
Blue movies. Adult books. Martial aides. The Mail is so demure…
Home Secretary Jacqui Smith’s political future was in jeopardy tonight after it was revealed that her husband used her Commons expenses allowance to pay to watch pornographic films. Richard Timney, who works as Ms Smith’s Commons adviser, used part of the Minister’s second-homes allowance to pay for the blue movies he watched on a subscription television channel.
Home Sexretary And Dicky:
The relationship between Ms Smith and her husband was said by Government insiders to be ‘very difficult,’ but stressed that the couple were still together. It is understood that Mr Timney had been watching explicit adult movies on channels broadcast on the Virgin Media cable TV service.
The scandal revolves around an invoice on which Mr Timney is believed to have made the expenses claims. Subscribers to the service can access X-rated films on the Playboy Channel, the Adult Channel and Television X for around £11 a month. It is also possible to order adult channels on a pay-per-night basis for £5
Television X, which is owned by…?
PA: “Home Secretary in expenses apology”
Home Secretary Jacqui Smith has apologised and promised to pay back money which she wrongly claimed for a television package which was reported to include adult movies. Ms Smith said she “mistakenly” claimed for the television package while submitting a bill for an internet connection.
Ben Westwood, son of fashion designer Vivienne Westwood, suggested that “Jack Straw and the Home Secretary Jacqui Smith need to be bound up together and gagged”. So logn as she pays for the rope and cuffs herself, then no harm done. No, actually, she can claim on expenses. We’ll let that one slide.
It-was-for-research-purposes!
Sky News: “Home Sec In ‘Adult Film’ Expenses Row”
Ms Smith said through her spokesman: “I am sorry that in claiming for my internet connection, I mistakenly claimed for a television package alongside it.
“As soon as the matter was brought to my attention, I took immediate steps to contact the relevant parliamentary authorities and rectify the situation.
“All money claimed for the television package will be paid back in full.”
Daily Telegraph: “Must we really subsidise pornography for Jacqui Smith’s husband?”
Milo Yiannopoulos says:
But even I feel a little sorry for her now. Smith’s marriage has been on the rocks for some time, and her husband – whom we pay £40,000 a year to run her Redditch office – is becoming a serious liability.
If these fresh allegations turn out to be true, Smith must resign.
Why her husband? Why can’t Smith have enjoyed the porn?
Posted: 30th, March 2009 | In: Key Posts, Politicians Comments (10) | TrackBack | Permalink
