Tiger Woods: National Enquirer Claims Proof Of An Affair With Rachel Uchitel
TIGER Woods crashes his car. Elin Nordegren reacts with speed and a decent swing to save the day. Rachel Uchitel denies any involvement with Woods. And the National Enquirer says that there is more to the story.
That’s the National Enquirer, of which Uchitel says:
“I don’t appreciate my name or what people think of me being dragged through the mud by people who don’t even bother to research what or who they’re talking about … they should research who these stories are coming from, who they’re believing as a credible source. Not to mention that it’s in the National Enquirer.”
As we wrote, is this the National Enquirer that exposed John Edwards’ secret love child or the NE that says Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie are breaking up nearly every week, a story the very famous are unlikely to challenge under law becuse to do so would dignify any claim and expose the stars to questions and intrusion?
But thus pricked, the NE reacts. Anorak hears from a source at the magazine who delivers this news:
NATIONAL ENQUIRER WORLD EXCLUSIVE: WOMAN AT CENTER OF TIGER WOODS CHEATING SCANDAL EXPOSED!!
Inside the magazine’s next issue, readers will be told:
The ENQUIRER’s blockbuster cover story was verified with polygraphs, multiple sources and an on-the-record exclusive interview with one of Rachel’s friends.
And now The ENQUIRER has caught Rachel in a slew of contradictions during the past 24 hours as she’s been questioned by other media about her relationship with Tiger.
The Enquirer seems pretty certain of itself.
The ENQUIRER is reporting exclusively in its print edition that the 34-year-old brunette, who has a reputation for dating married celebrities, has been telling friends about a jet-set liaison with 33-year-old Tiger that began in June.
Multiple sources, who passed polygraph tests, say Rachel told them that she and Tiger also stay in touch during his frequent travels through phone calls and “sexting,” sending each other racy text messages on their cell phones.
But no word from Uchitel other than an outright denial.
One close friend of Rachel’s — Ashley Samson — told The ENQUIRER: “Rachel told me, ‘I’m having an affair with Tiger Woods. We’re in love!'”
And while Rachel emphatically says she’s no home wrecker, she recently had a disastrous affair with David Boreanaz, the star of Bones. The affair even continued while his wife was pregnant and was reported exclusively by Star magazine.
Uchitel has, allegedly, some form. But she denies any involvement with Woods.
Rachel, an events planner and former director of VIP operations at the NYC nightclub Grffin, has attempted to distance herself from the growing scandal in several comments made to media in the last 24 hours, including to the Associated Press, New York Post and New York Daily News.
But The ENQUIRER can show how Rachel’s denials are full of contradictions!
Rachel, who denies an affair with Tiger, told one media outlet that she hardly knows Ashley, who is quoted on-the-record in our story. Rachel said she wasn’t even sure of the woman’s last name.
However, we can reveal that Rachel is such a close friend of Ashley’s that she recently invited Ashley to join her and some other pals on a trip to Spain.
They love golf in Spain…
AND in an ENQUIRER web exclusive, we’re publishing a photo showing Rachel partying with her friend Ashley on that recent trip to Spain. (SEE ABOVE: Ashley is the blonde, Rachel is the brunette)
Well, this proves that they have met. And the picture show Ashley, who with those breasts bursting with truth and stuffing can only be trusted. But wouldn’t a “New York party girl” have met a lot of other people?
Rachel, who confesses that she does know Tiger, also outrageously says she’s never even texted Tiger.
Why is this outrageous?
But Ashley told The ENQUIRER: “Rachel said she first met Tiger in May at a New York club where she was working, and gave him her number. In June she told me, ‘Tiger Woods is blowing up my cell phone with messages!’
A night club promoter gave a multi-millionaire superstar her phone number, allegedly. Might she have done this to promote her club?
And another source — who passed a polygraph test — told The ENQUIRER: “They were constantly ‘sexting.’ Tiger was asking things like, ‘What are you wearing? What do you want to do to me? What do you want me to do to you?’
Not since snooker’s Steve Davis potted cheated on his wife Judith with 19-year-old Cheree Palla has so dull a sportsman, allegedly, striven so hard to make themselves look interesting. It was Palla who said in the Mirror: “He was the best lover I’d ever had. He did things to me I didn’t even know you could do.”
Back in the NE:
“I said, ‘Rachel, he’s married,’ and she said, ‘Big (bleeping) deal! It’s Tiger Woods! I don’t care about his wife! We’re in love.’
“Her nickname for Tiger is ‘Bear.’ She lists his cell phone number under ‘Bear’ in her contacts.'”
Not Bare. Bear. As in the animal.
Rachel has even been caught in outright lies in specific comment responses to The ENQUIRER.
Rachel traveled to Australia to meet with Tiger while he played earlier this month in the Australian Masters, both sources said. BUT Rachel initially told us she traveled there with a boyfriend.
In a later conversation, however, she admitted to The ENQUIRER she had lied about going to Australia with a boyfriend. She said she was in the country “for business.”
Can she not have travelled with a boyfriend and conducted business?
She also said she was not in Tiger’s hotel. But an Enquirer reporter eye witnessed her IN the hotel.
She then said she did not go to the floor of the hotel where Tiger was staying.
BUT an ENQUIRER reporter in Melbourne watched as Rachel checked in to the posh Crown Towers hotel, and went up to the 35th floor, which houses the hotel’s ritzy VIP Suite. Tiger was staying in the same hotel, according to local press reports.
Surely a coincidence? Anorak’s source at the Enquirer tells us:
In our print story, Tiger’s attorney vehemently denied an affair between Tiger and Rachel but said the golfer may have been at the same nightclub as Rachel at some point.
Well, yes, he may have. He may have been their with lots of people.
Rachel also told The ENQUIRER she met Tiger on two other occasions.
So while Rachel responds to reporters questions with emphatic denials and outrage, exclaiming she would never want to be the other woman, the ENQUIRER’s new story, ON SALE NOW provides LOTS of evidence to the contrary.
Well, no it doesn’t. It provides a slew of alleged circumstantial evidence and quotes from sources who cannot offer any concrete proof of an affair.
Now read on…
Posted: 30th, November 2009 | In: Key Posts, National Enquirer Comment (1) | TrackBack | Permalink
