In Pictures: Susan Boyle Might Sue Lindsay Lohan Over Milkaholic Slur
BEFORE pictures of Lindsay Lohan watching models in Paris walk up and down – because, like, everyone in Europe walks – news that the actress is suing E-Trade for, as she claims, modelling a “milkaholic” baby on her. Susan Boyle is watching.
Lindsay Lohan For Purple (NSFW)
Has Lohan ever been addicted to milk? Has she ever stolen a boyfriend, like the milkaholic baby does? When little did she dream of being a corporate drone?
Whatever. Lohan is nothing if she is not reasonable and wants $100 million for her pain and suffering – $50 pain for hurt and distress and another $50 from the millions the advert must made because it used the name Lindsay when it was aired during the Super Bowl.
Lindsay Lohan For Purple (NSFW)
Lohan’s lawyer, a Stephanie Ovadia, puts it to the court that she enjoys the same single-name recognition as Oprah, Madonna, Cher, Kermit, Biggles, Moses, Napoloeon, Cinderella, Jordan, Diana, Jesus and Anthea.
Says he:
“Many celebrities are known by one name only, and E-Trade is using that knowledge to profit. They used the name Lindsay. They’re using her name as a parody of her life. Why didn’t they use the name Susan? This is a subliminal message. Everybody’s talking about it and saying it’s Lindsay Lohan.”
Susan? What does she mean by that? Is he saying that Susan’s are unapproachable and less marketable than Lindsays? Susan can be shortened to Sue, Mrs Fancy Lawyer. Think on. (Susan Boyle has not yet commented.)
Lindsay Lohan For Purple (NSFW)
Chris Brown, of Grey Group, which created the advert says it’s “just used a popular baby name that happened to be the name of someone on the account team“.
That’s Lindsay the new intern, the one who poops their pants and spits up congealed milk, allegedly…
Here are those pictures:
no images were found
Posted: 9th, March 2010 | In: Celebrities, Key Posts Comment | TrackBack | Permalink
