Irma Nici Calls David Beckham A ‘Whore’: Photos
IRMA Nici, aka Irma Nezirovic, is the prostitute who says she had sex with David Beckham and the tabloids have called a liar. No proof that she had sex with Beckhams has been offered up, nor evidence that he masturbated with own-brand, hotel-supplied cream (what – no Cream De Placenta and cashmere mitten?!). But the tabloids claim to know one thing for certain: Irma Nici is a liar.
Says Irma Nici:
“I very much look forward to my day in court and the opportunity to tell the truth. I will be completely vindicated and Mr Beckham will be seen for the manipulative whore he is.”
The Star says she is willing to take lie detector test.
HOOKER Irma Nici is willing to take a lie detector test over her claims of three-in-a-bed sex with David Beckham.
The Mail produces the headline:
“Beckham, the hooker… and the tawdry claims she CAN’T prove”
Readers hear the words of Los Angeles attorney Bert H. Deixler he sent to In Touch, the magazine that published Nici’s claims:
“Let me make it clear. The story you propose to run about Mr Beckham and a prostitute is a lie. The allegations are unequivocally denied.”
If the story is published then it would end in an “enormous damages award”.
“Once again I urge you in the strongest possible terms not to bring these lawsuits upon yourself.”
Is a threatening letter from a lawyer enough? Again we say that there is no evidence Beckham has had sex with Irma Nici. But what are lawyers for if not firing off threatening letters?
As for it being lies… Well we have seen no proof that they are not. Beckham appears to be the victim of a a scam. But the case for Beckham, as presented by the Mail, is that everything Irma Nici thinks she knows about Beckham she could have got from Rebecca Loos (she said Becks had a distinguishing feature on his pecker – see photos below) and news stories. (Maybe it’s a bit like how you know Beckham from news stories?)
And as for Irma Nici’s claim that Beckham had wet hair when they met:
Miss Nici says that when Beckham opened the door of his suite, his hair was damp after a shower. Beckham — through his representatives — says this can’t be true because he was sporting a ‘grade one’ haircut at the time. In other words, his hair was so short it would probably have dried almost immediately. A photograph in the New York Times of Beckham on August 18 confirms he had a crew cut.
So. Everything she knows about Beckham she got from the news – aside from the bits she didn’t? It’s all salacious stuff.
You might suppose the Mail and other organs would be thankful to In Touch for giving air to Irma Nici’s story?
The Sun went to the trouble of producing photos of Nici accepting the £16m Beckham writ. She was seen smiling broadly. Says the Star’s Nigel Pauly:
The hooker then took cash from a photographer to pose for staged pictures of her “receiving” the writ in her own lawyer’s office.
The Sun says Beckham will give any cash award to charity.
A pal branded Nici a “lying harlot” and confirmed the fortune will go to help sick kids.
Back in the Mail, Paul Bracchi proceeds to call it lies and then repeat the allegation verbatim:
“After agreeing on a price for several hours of sex, David gave Irma $5,000 in cash, which he retrieved from an envelope in the hotel room safe. Then, at David’s request, Irma took a shower . . . She changed into black lingerie and they began to make out ‘passionately’ on the bed.”
Tawdry stuff, eh, Mail readers. Now read on…
“The two spent the next hour engaged in foreplay . . . after approximately an hour, Irma says the two had sex for 15 minutes. Irma ordered room service and suggested they invite another escort to join them. She claimed David agreed.
“When the brunette arrived, Irma told her to take a shower and the two engaged in a show for David.
“After the other woman left, David asked Irma to stay the night and, after agreeing a total price of $10,000, they took a bath together. They allegedly slept together one more time [in New York].
“David and Irma met up again [at a London hotel] about a month later… Irma claims he paid her about $5,000 for 90 minutes of what she characterises as stress-reliever sex.”
Tawdry and despicable stuff. Tsk! Feel free to read it again and be truly outraged.
Beckham is innocent. And in the meantime, enjoy the photos…
Posted: 29th, September 2010 | In: Key Posts, Sports Comments (3) | TrackBack | Permalink
