Frederik Rosén: International Humanitarian Law Says Drones Are Good
DRONES. What sue are they? Frederik Rosén argues that it’s our duty to use them:
If a state possesses drone technology, and if the deployment of this technology may potentially reduce unnecessary harm from armed attacks, the state is obliged to employ the technology. This is not at all different from the obligation to pick up the binoculars before firing the shells. The obligation to use drones for precaution is logically not limited to drone attacks. It applies across all weapon systems. Even in the near future, ground attacks may no longer be lawful without engaging available drone technology for the purpose of precaution. … It is as if drone technology lifts the “fog of war” from critical aspects of the use of armed force. We therefore need to think through the application of the laws of war in armed conflicts characterized by total visibility. Because drone technology is not only a game changer, it also triggers obligations.
Spotter: Andrew Sullivan
Posted: 8th, November 2013 | In: Reviews Comment | TrackBack | Permalink
